Pando & Pereira 2007 - Versionsgeschichte

imported>Dagmar Triebel: Dagmar Triebel verschob die Seite World Conservation Monitoring Centre 2007 nach Pando & Pereira 2007

2019-05-10T16:41:03Z

Dagmar Triebel verschob die Seite World Conservation Monitoring Centre 2007 nach Pando & Pereira 2007

← Nächstältere Version	Version vom 10. Mai 2019, 18:41 Uhr
(kein Unterschied)

imported>Dagmar Triebel am 10. Mai 2019 um 16:37 Uhr

2019-05-10T16:37:56Z

← Nächstältere Version		Version vom 10. Mai 2019, 18:37 Uhr
Zeile 5:		Zeile 5:
	\|Stichworte=TDWG prior standard; Date created 1995-10-01; Prior standard; http://www.tdwg.org/standards/106		\|Stichworte=TDWG prior standard; Date created 1995-10-01; Prior standard; http://www.tdwg.org/standards/106
	\|Herausgeber=World Conservation Monitoring Centre and International Working Group on Taxonomic Databases Standard (TDWG)		\|Herausgeber=World Conservation Monitoring Centre and International Working Group on Taxonomic Databases Standard (TDWG)
	\|Zusammenfassung=The development of agreed standards for the management of information is a key issue in ensuring that data can be shared on as wide a level as possible, and as easily as possible. This is particularly important for data maintained in computerised format on databases, if this data is to be made available to many users.		\|Zusammenfassung=The development of agreed standards for the management of information is a key issue in ensuring that data can be shared on as wide a level as possible, and as easily as possible. This is particularly important for data maintained in computerised format on databases, if this data is to be made available to many users. Considerable debate may be involved in the preparation of agreed standards which, at first sight, may appear deceptively simple. However, all those involved in management of data will be well aware of the problems that exist if there is no clear, agreed standard to follow for a particular issue. In the worst instances, lack of agreed standards can mean data sets are managed in such a way that wasteful re-keying in of data is needed. The current standard, the Plant Occurrence and Status Scheme (POSS) has been developed to provide standard terms for recording the occurrence of a plant taxon for a specific location. As with all standards, POSS aims to provide both a clear, unambiguous framework for information management, and at the same time provides a mechanism for information exchange.

	Considerable debate may be involved in the preparation of agreed standards which, at first sight, may appear deceptively simple. However, all those involved in management of data will be well aware of the problems that exist if there is no clear, agreed standard to follow for a particular issue. In the worst instances, lack of agreed standards can mean data sets are managed in such a way that wasteful re-keying in of data is needed.

	The current standard, the Plant Occurrence and Status Scheme (POSS) has been developed to provide standard terms for recording the occurrence of a plant taxon for a specific location.

	As with all standards, POSS aims to provide both a clear, unambiguous framework for information management, and at the same time provides a mechanism for information exchange.
	\|Online=https://github.com/tdwg/prior-standards/blob/master/poss/106-522-1-RV.pdf		\|Online=https://github.com/tdwg/prior-standards/blob/master/poss/106-522-1-RV.pdf
	}}		}}

imported>Dagmar Triebel am 10. Mai 2019 um 16:32 Uhr

2019-05-10T16:32:55Z

← Nächstältere Version		Version vom 10. Mai 2019, 18:32 Uhr
Zeile 1:		Zeile 1:
	{{Literatur		{{Literatur
	\|Autor=~~World Conservation Monitoring Centre~~;		\|Autor=Pando, F.; Pereira, R.
	\|Jahr=2007		\|Jahr=2007
	\|Titel=Plant Occurrence and Status Scheme (POSS)		\|Titel=Plant Occurrence and Status Scheme (POSS)
	\|Stichworte=TDWG prior standard; Date created 1995-10-01; Prior standard; http://www.tdwg.org/standards/106		\|Stichworte=TDWG prior standard; Date created 1995-10-01; Prior standard; http://www.tdwg.org/standards/106
	\|Herausgeber=TDWG		\|Herausgeber=World Conservation Monitoring Centre and International Working Group on Taxonomic Databases Standard (TDWG)
	\|Zusammenfassung=The development of agreed standards for the management of information is a key issue in ensuring that data can be shared on as wide a level as possible, and as easily as possible. This is particularly important for data maintained in computerised format on databases, if this data is to be made available to many users.		\|Zusammenfassung=The development of agreed standards for the management of information is a key issue in ensuring that data can be shared on as wide a level as possible, and as easily as possible. This is particularly important for data maintained in computerised format on databases, if this data is to be made available to many users.

imported>Dagmar Triebel: Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „{{Literatur |Autor=World Conservation Monitoring Centre; |Jahr=2007 |Titel=Plant Occurrence and Status Scheme (POSS) |Stichworte=TDWG prior standard; Date crea…“

2019-05-10T16:28:42Z

Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „{{Literatur |Autor=World Conservation Monitoring Centre; |Jahr=2007 |Titel=Plant Occurrence and Status Scheme (POSS) |Stichworte=TDWG prior standard; Date crea…“

Neue Seite

{{Literatur
|Autor=World Conservation Monitoring Centre;
|Jahr=2007
|Titel=Plant Occurrence and Status Scheme (POSS)
|Stichworte=TDWG prior standard; Date created 1995-10-01; Prior standard; http://www.tdwg.org/standards/106
|Herausgeber=TDWG
|Zusammenfassung=The development of agreed standards for the management of information is a key issue in ensuring that data can be shared on as wide a level as possible, and as easily as possible. This is particularly important for data maintained in computerised format on databases, if this data is to be made available to many users.

Considerable debate may be involved in the preparation of agreed standards which, at first sight, may appear deceptively simple. However, all those involved in management of data will be well aware of the problems that exist if there is no clear, agreed standard to follow for a particular issue. In the worst instances, lack of agreed standards can mean data sets are managed in such a way that wasteful re-keying in of data is needed.

The current standard, the Plant Occurrence and Status Scheme (POSS) has been developed to provide standard terms for recording the occurrence of a plant taxon for a specific location.

As with all standards, POSS aims to provide both a clear, unambiguous framework for information management, and at the same time provides a mechanism for information exchange.
|Online=https://github.com/tdwg/prior-standards/blob/master/poss/106-522-1-RV.pdf
}}